Reduced Length of Stay
Studies have shown that this robotic surgery technique results in an overall shorter length of stay for minimally invasive spine surgery, 2.6 days less than open freehand procedures enabled by fluoroscopy.
Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42(6):353–8
Fan Y, Du J, Zhang J, Liu S, Xue X, Huang Y, Zhang J, Hao D. Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 16;23:5960-5968.
Operating Time
Studies have also demonstrated a significant reduction in time spent placing screws during surgery. Time to place screws was reduced from a mean of 6.7 +/- 0.9 minutes in navigated procedures to 3.7 +/- 1.8 minutes using this robotic spine surgery technology. Faster surgery results in less time under anaesthesia, which can reduce patient risks.
Khan A, Meyers JE, Yavorek S, et al. Comparing Next-Generation Robotic Technology with 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation Technology for the Insertion of Posterior Pedicle Screws. World Neurosurg 2019; 123, e474-e481.
Accuracy
Finally, studies showed a significant reduction in deviation of screw placement from preoperative planning with robotic spine surgery as compared to fluoroscopy, from a mean of 2.6mm +/- 0.7 to 1.1mm +/- .4.
Lieberman IH, Hardenbrook MA, Wang JC, Guyer RD. Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25(5):241–8